Traffic:   21 Incidents
Weather: 31°F Go
  10:12pm EST, 01/08/09
Search:    1010wins.com  Web  Audio
Local News
Text Size:   A   A   A

Posted: Thursday, 13 November 2008 5:52PM

New Jersey AG Argues Corzine's E-Mails are Private

TRENTON, N.J. (AP)  -- The governor would not be able to govern if his private communications were open to the public, New Jersey's attorney general told a state appeals panel Thursday.

The argument was made as Gov. Jon S. Corzine pressed to keep secret the e-mails he exchanged during contract talks with the public employee union leader he once dated.

Attorney General Anne Milgram, whose office represents the governor, argued that e-mails between Corzine and ex-girlfriend Carla Katz are protected by executive privilege.

Milgram told the court that Corzine, a Democrat, needs assurance his communications will be kept private in order to govern effectively and that the governor's ability to run the state would be compromised if citizens can see his private communications.

State Republican leader Tom Wilson and several news organizations, including The Associated Press, sought the release of the e-mails. In May, a lower court ruled the public has a right to know what was said.

Corzine is appealing that ruling. A decision from the three-judge panel isn't expected for at least two weeks.

``We come to court today with a significant constitutional policy question,'' said Milgram, who argued the case herself.

She said that governors should be able to decide when to invoke the privilege over their own communication and that their decisions should be overruled only if a compelling need to see the communication can be shown _ a standard no private citizen could meet, she acknowledged.

GOP lawyer Mark Sheridan told the court that by accepting Milgram's argument, it would shield virtually all governor's office communication from public view. He successfully argued in the lower court that the public's right to see the exchanges outweighs the state's interest in keeping them secret.

Wilson questions whether state worker contract negotiations were tainted by the relationship between Corzine and Katz, who dated before Corzine became governor.

He said the e-mails could show what, if any, influence Katz had in Corzine's decision to stop the Legislature from tackling state worker pension and health care reforms in 2007. At the time, Corzine said he'd rather do it at the bargaining table.

Corzine insists he did not negotiate the state worker contract with Katz.

A state ethics panel appointed by Corzine reviewed the e-mails and decided they did not influence contract talks or violate ethics rules.

However, Katz has said that some of the e-mails were ``in connection with'' union contract negotiations. Her attorney has argued that the e-mails should remain private because communications involving collective bargaining are protected under federal law.

Corzine's office has said that there are 50 e-mails from Katz to the governor, 11 e-mails from the governor to Katz, and 11 e-mails from Katz to Tom Shea -- who was Corzine's chief of staff at the time -- that list Corzine as receiving a courtesy copy.

The pair dated from 2002 to 2004 while he was a New Jersey senator. She received large sums of money from him when they parted.

Neither Corzine nor Katz attended the court proceedings.


TM & Copyright 2008 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO & EYE Logo TM & Copyright 2008 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. TheAssociated Press contributed to this report.
Show Comments
 
 
11/13/2008 12:37PM
S.I. Bob
Absolutely not. Any e-mails sent or received over the Government's internet system are public property.
11/13/2008 12:39PM
Corzine's e-mails
No, I do not agree with the AG or Corzine
11/13/2008 12:42PM
Ken
absolutely not as there may have been misuse of government property. Why is there not government in the sunshine
11/13/2008 12:45PM
Corzine
If he is not quilty of anything, what does he have to hide.....sounds pretty suspicious to me......
11/13/2008 12:46PM
Is it his government e-mail?
If it is his government e-mail, it is government property.
11/13/2008 1:11PM
release 'em
these contract talks have smelled bad from day one. if there wasnt the history b/t these 2 prob wudnt be an issue. but cornize is a dirty politican w. plenty to hide ... public has a rite to know if these contracts were really in the taxpayers best interest
11/13/2008 1:20PM
Greg Dan
Business as usual in NJ, that why Nj has the bad reputation as corrupt.
11/13/2008 1:25PM
Garrett
He is a paid public official. Everything he says a does in the Govenors "office" is public and on the record.
11/13/2008 1:25PM
Corzine
He's in public office, therefore, everything he does while in office, is, and should remain public.
11/13/2008 1:29PM
anybody but a democrat
If he has nothing to hide then they should be made public property
11/13/2008 1:30PM
No Way
Of course not. Everyone reading this probably knows that their employer has told them their company e-mail is not private and could be monitored. Corzine, coming from Goldman Sachs with its regulatory mandated e-mail review should know this and is crazy if he thinks the public government would be more lax.
11/13/2008 1:30PM
Double Standards
Corporate policy dictates that email is not private property. The same applies to Government. Who is Corzine in cahoots with to get a ruling like this. It just raises more suspicion that something underhanded being hidden from the public. Given New Jerseys history of political improprieties, Corzine should set the standard and make clear the air.
11/13/2008 1:31PM
Silly
The folks who are crying foul all want the truth, but it is the TRUTH that you dont want to know or hear about. If there is a criminal case here, then let the lawyers take care of that but other than that, some things are meant to be private for obviousreasons.
11/13/2008 1:32PM
Corzine
Why is he fighting this so hard? If there's nothing to hide, show the emails and get on with it.
11/13/2008 1:35PM
anybody but a democrat
He is just as guilty as all the rest of them
11/13/2008 2:03PM
Typical Democrat
Disgusting, Im voting him out next election
11/13/2008 2:30PM
Corzine's e-Mails
Yes, I think they should remain private.
11/13/2008 2:30PM
Disgusted Democrat
Absolutely not.This guy has been a major dissapointment. Money & the democratic machine got him into office. Another McGreevy, Florio. Losers. I just can bring myself to go Republican.
11/13/2008 4:14PM
Time to stop the nonsence
First of all if whatever was said in those emails was meant to be private then it should have been spoken in private and not sent via e-mail. Second of all contract negotiatians were supposed to be private also and if Ms Katz and the govenor were doingtheir own private negotiations the Union Members she was supposed to be representing certainly have a right to know
11/13/2008 5:18PM
What would you expect
Would you really expect anything different from one of Corzine's political appointees? After all he is a politician!
11/13/2008 5:29PM
PRIVATE EMAIL
All the politicians use private email accounts for their secret dealings from the Bush Administration, to Sarah Palin, to Gov. Jon Corzine. Republican or Democrat what is the difference here? Elected officials shouldn't be using private email accounts to discuss government or state dealings on period. Any email account they have should be subject to viewing... what are the hiding by using these private email accounts?
11/13/2008 12:31PM
Corzine's E-Mails
Do you agree with New Jersey's attorney general that e-mails between Gov. Jon Corzine and his ex-girlfriend Carla Katz -- the public employee union leader he once dated -- are protected by executive privilege?
Title:
Comment:
Print Page Email This Page
Featured Audio
 
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 
News Watch
 
 

Weddings
Find Wedding Locations, Wedding Photography, Bridal Expo, and other wedding resources in the New York area from PartyPOP.com